Kvasny Prum. 2012; 58(9): 256-263 | DOI: 10.18832/kp2012024

Year prognoses of the alpha acid contents in Czech hops.Peer-reviewed article

Karel KROFTA, Alexandr MIKYŠKA, Jana TICHÁ
1 Chmelařský institut s.r.o., Kadaňská 2525, 438 46 Žatec
2 Výzkumný ústav pivovarský a sladařský a.s., Lípová 15, 120 44 Praha 2
3 Chmelařství, družstvo Žatec, Mostecká 2580, 438 01 Žatec

A content of alpha acids which is from brewing and commercial point of view, the most important quality parameter of hops, is subjected to distinctive year-to-year fluctuations. It is therefore requires well-timed and reliable information about quality of current crop harvest. Introduced system of alpha acids content evaluation in Czech hops consists of pre-harvest and harvest prognoses and detailed examination of true values. Assessment system is differentiated according to varieties and hop growing regions. This study summarizes the results of year prognoses of alpha acid contents in Czech hops for more than last 15 years. Predicted values compares with true ones and investigates the sources of systematic errors. Pre-harvest prognosis provides early information. The rate of agreement with reality depends primarily on the course of weather conditions before and during the harvest. Prognoses of harvest results are in good compliance with true ones due to relatively high number of evaluated samples (r = 0,986 for Saaz hops in 18 years period). Pre-harvest prognoses for Saaz aroma variety, category VF (virus-free), and hybrid varieties Sládek and Premiant are affected by proportion of samples from young and old plants with very different level of alpha acid contents. Current system of evaluation provides relatively precise information sufficient for the needs of growers, hop processors, merchants and brewers.A content of alpha acids which is from brewing and commercial point of view, the most important quality parameter of hops, is subjected to distinctive year-to-year fluctuations. It is therefore requires well-timed and reliable information about quality of current crop harvest. Introduced system of alpha acids content evaluation in Czech hops consists of pre-harvest and harvest prognoses and detailed examination of true values. Assessment system is differentiated according to varieties and hop growing regions. This study summarizes the results of year prognoses of alpha acid contents in Czech hops for more than last 15 years. Predicted values compares with true ones and investigates the sources of systematic errors. Pre-harvest prognosis provides early information. The rate of agreement with reality depends primarily on the course of weather conditions before and during the harvest. Prognoses of harvest results are in good compliance with true ones due to relatively high number of evaluated samples (r = 0,986 for Saaz hops in 18 years period). Pre-harvest prognoses for Saaz aroma variety, category VF (virus-free), and hybrid varieties Sládek and Premiant are affected by proportion of samples from young and old plants with very different level of alpha acid contents. Current system of evaluation provides relatively precise information sufficient for the needs of growers, hop processors, merchants and brewers.

Keywords: hops, Saaz aroma variety, Czech hybrid varieties, alpha acids, HPLC, lead conductance value

Received: May 25, 2012; Accepted: July 25, 2012; Published: September 1, 2012 

References

  1. Analytica EBC, 1998: Hans Carl Getränke Fachverlag, Nürenberg, Method 7.7.
  2. Barth-Haas Group, 2011: The Barth Report, Hops 2010/2011: 9-29.
  3. Čejka, P., Kellner, V., Čepička, J., 1998: Mezilaboratorní zkoušení analýz chmele. Kvasny Prum. 44: 362-365. Go to original source...
  4. Česká technická norma ČSN 462520, 1997: Zkoušení chmele, část 15 - Stanovení konduktometrické hodnoty chmele. Český normalizační institut.
  5. Daoud, I.S., Kusinski, S., 1992: Liquid CO2 and ethanol extraction of hops: Part I: Effect of hop deterioration on extraction efficiency and extract quality. J. Inst. Brew. 98: 37-41. Go to original source...
  6. Forster, A., 1995: Spezifishe Probleme der Deutschen Hopfenernte 1994. Hopfen-Rundschau, No. 1: 7-10. Hopsteiner, 2011: 2010 Guidelines for Hop Buing.
  7. Krofta, K., Nesvadba, V., Tichá, J., Urban, J., Čepička, J., 2003: Kvalitativní a ekonomické aspekty stárnutí českých odrůd chmele.
  8. Kvasny Prum. 49: 326-335.
  9. Krofta, K., Kroupa, F., 1995: Hodnocení analytických ukazatelů českého chmele v roce 1994. Chmelařství 68: 59-64.
  10. Meloun, M., Militký, J., 1994: Statistické zpracování experimentálních dat. Plus spol. s r.o., ISBN 80-85297-56-6.
  11. Mikyška, A., Jurková, M., Poledníková, M., 1999: Pivovarská hodnota českých a moravských chmelů ze sklizně 1999. Kvasny Prum. 45: 300-301.
  12. Schmidt, F., Johansen, J.O., 1994: Deterioration of Hop Pelletsanalysis by HPLC. Proceedings of Symposiun on Hops, Zoeterwoude, The Netherlands, 58-71.