Kvasny Prum. 2014; 60(2): 22-30 | DOI: 10.18832/kp2014003

Initiation of carbon dioxide liberation from beer and its gushing.Peer-reviewed article

Jan ŠAVEL, Petr KOŠIN, Adam BROŽ
Budějovický Budvar, n.p., Karolíny Světlé 4, 370 21 České Budějovice

The article discusses the measurement of bottle weight changes after its opening followed by addition of a powder or solid materials in beer or electrolysis. Bottle mass loss corresponds to escape of CO2 and other volatile substances, including water vapor from beer. Escape rate of CO2 after the addition of powdered materials to beer decreased with their wetting. Partially wettable rubber stopper and silicone stopper with a hydrophobic surface were used as a macro - model for the CO2 escape from carbonated beverages measurement. The rubber stopper inserted into beer increased escape rate of CO2 from the beer and this ability was not inhibited by its wetting, boiling, pasteurization or its stay in wort and beer during fermentation. The release of CO2 from the beer can be induced by mechanical movement of beer, or its electrolysis. The intensity of CO2 transfer from beer to the gaseous phase depends on the surface properties of solid particles and liquid properties.The article discusses the measurement of bottle weight changes after its opening followed by addition of a powder or solid materials in beer or electrolysis. Bottle mass loss corresponds to escape of CO2 and other volatile substances, including water vapor from beer. Escape rate of CO2 after the addition of powdered materials to beer decreased with their wetting. Partially wettable rubber stopper and silicone stopper with a hydrophobic surface were used as a macro - model for the CO2 escape from carbonated beverages measurement. The rubber stopper inserted into beer increased escape rate of CO2 from the beer and this ability was not inhibited by its wetting, boiling, pasteurization or its stay in wort and beer during fermentation. The release of CO2 from the beer can be induced by mechanical movement of beer, or its electrolysis. The intensity of CO2 transfer from beer to the gaseous phase depends on the surface properties of solid particles and liquid properties.

Keywords: supersaturation, gushing, hydrophobicity, particle surface, elektrolysis, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen

Received: October 25, 2013; Accepted: January 6, 2014; Published: February 1, 2014 

References

  1. Amaha, M., Horiuchi, G., Yabuuchi, S., 1978: Involvement of chill-proofing enzymes in the winter-type gushing of bottled beer. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am., 15(1): 15-22.
  2. Amaha, M., Kitabatake, K., 1981: Gushing in beer. In: Brewing Science. Ed. J.R.A. Pollock, Academic Press London: 457-489. ISBN 978-0125610025.
  3. Běláková, S., Benešová, K., Mikulíková, R., Svoboda, Z., 2012: Faktory ovlivňující gushing. Kvasny Prum., 58(3): 62-65. Go to original source...
  4. Benilov, E. S., Cummins, C. P., Lee, W. T., 2013: Why do bubbles in Guiness sink? Am. J. Phys. 81(2): 88. arXiv:1205.5233. Go to original source...
  5. Blechová, P., Havlová, P., Havel, J., 2005: The study of premature yeast flocculation and its relationship with gushing of beer. Monatsschr. Brauwiss., 58(9/10): 64-78.
  6. Brenner, M. W., 1957: Gushing beer II. Causes and some means of prevention. Eur. Brew. Conv.: Proc. 6th Copenhagen: 349-362.
  7. Casey, G. P., 1996: Primary versus secondary gushing and assay procedures used to assess malt/beer gushing potential. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am., 33(4): 229-235.
  8. Deckers, S. M., Gebruers, K., Baggerman, G., Lorgouilloux, Y., Delcour, J. A., Michiels, C., Derdelinckx, G., Martens, J., Neven, H., 2010: CO2-hydrophobin structures acting as nanobombs in beer. Part 1: A critical review of hypotheses and mechanisms. BrewingScience, 63(3/4): 54-61.
  9. Deckers, S. M., Vissers, L., et al., 2013: Thermodynamic view of primary gushing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 71(3): 149-152. Go to original source...
  10. Deckers, S. M., Venken, T., et al., 2012: Combined modelling and biophysical characterisation of CO2 interaction with class II hydrophobins: new insight into the mechanism undderpinning primary gushing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem., 70(4): 249-256. Go to original source...
  11. Devereux, M. G., Lee, W. T., 2011: Mathematical modelling of bubble nucleattion in stout beers and experimental verification. Proc. World Congr. Engin. WCE 2011, Vol. I. ISBN 978-988-18210-6-5.
  12. Draeger, M., 1996: Physical observation on the subject of gushing. Brauwelt Int., 14(4): 363-367.
  13. Ferdinandus, A., Gombert, J., Jansen, H. E., 1962: Contribution to the problem of gushing. J. Inst. Brew., 68(3): 250-253. Go to original source...
  14. Gardner, R. J., 1972: Surface viscosity and gushing. J. Inst. Brew., 78(5): 391-398. Go to original source...
  15. Gardner, R. J., 1973: The mechanismus of gushing - A review., J. Inst. Brew. 79(4): 275-286. Go to original source...
  16. Gastl, M., Zarnkow, M., Back, W., 2009: Gushing - a multicausal problem. Brauwelt Int. 27(1): 16-20.
  17. Hopkins, R. H., Berridge, N. J., 1949: The coagulable protein of sweet wort. J. Inst. Brew., 55(5): 306-315. Go to original source...
  18. Hudson, J. R., 1962: Some observations on the treatment of gushing beers with nylon powder. J. Inst. Brew., 68(6): 460-468. Go to original source...
  19. Christian, M., Titze, J., Ilberg, V., Jacob, F., 2011: Novel perspectives in gushing analysis: A review. J. Inst. Brew., 117(3): 295-313. Go to original source...
  20. Ilberg, V., Titze, J., Christian, M., Jacob, F., Parlar, H., 2009: Current developments and findings in rapid gushing test analysis. Brauwelt Int., 27(1): 22-24.
  21. Jones, S. F., Evans, G. M., Galvin, K. P., 1999: Bubble nucleation from gas cavities - a review. Advances Coll. Interface Sci., 80(1): 27-50. Go to original source...
  22. Pellaud, J., 2002: Gushing: state of the art. Cerevisia, 27(4): 189-205.
  23. Setua, D. K., Awasthi, R., Kumar, S., Prasad, M., Agarwal. K., 2010: Scanning electron microscopy of natural rubber surfaces: quantitative statistical and spectral texture analysis using digital image processing. In: Microscopy: science, technology, applications and education. Eds: Méndez-Vilas and Diaz, Formatex research center. 4. vyd., vol. 3: 1642-1651.
  24. Shokribousjein, Z., Deckers, S. M., Gebruers, K., Lorgouillox, A., Baggermann, G., Verachtert, H., Delcour, J. A., Etienne, P., Rock, J., Michiels, G., Derdelinckx, G., 2011: Hydrophobins, beer foaming and gushing. Cerevisia, 35(4), 85-101. Go to original source...
  25. Šavel, J., 2004: Měření vzdušného kyslíku a nadměrného pěnění piva v obalech. Kvasny Prum. 50(3): 66-69. Go to original source...
  26. Šavel, J., Košin, P., Brož, A., 2013: Samovolný únik oxidu uhličitého z piva a gushing. Kvasny Prum. 59(2): 34-41. Go to original source...
  27. Titze, J., Christian, M., Ilberg, V., Jacob, F.: Particle analysis - a combined method to analyze the colloidal characteristics of particles. BrewingScience 2010, 63(5/6): 62-71.
  28. Winkelmann, L., Hinzmann, E.: The gushing puzzle - parts are still missing. Brauwelt Int. 2009, 27(1): 13-15.
  29. Zepf, M., Geiger, E., 2000: Gushing problems caused by calcium oxalate, Part 1, Brauwelt Int. 18(6): 473-475.
  30. Zepf, M., Geiger, E., 2001: Gushing problems caused by calcium oxalate (2), Brauwelt Int. 19(5): 420-425.