Kvasny Prum. 2009; 55(11-12): 326-330 | DOI: 10.18832/kp2009028

Barley varieties registered in the Slovak Republic in 2009.Peer-reviewed article

Vratislav PSOTA, Lenka SACHAMBULA, Marián SVORAD
1 Výzkumný ústav pivovarský a sladařský, Sladařský ústav, Mostecká 7, CZ-614 00 Brno
2 Ústredný kontrolný a skúšobný ústav poľnohospodársky Odbor odrodového skúšobníctva, Veľké Ripňany, Slovenská republika

In 2009 six malting varieties of spring barley were registered in the Slovak Republic. All the studied varieties had the optimal level of proteolytic, amylolytic and cytolytic modification. The variety Donaris had extract on the level of 82.7% and wort composition on the level of 82.8 %. Eskobar had high extract content (83.0%) and apparent final attenuation achieved values of 82.6%. Extract of the variety Kangoo was on the level of 82.1% and apparent final attenuation was high (83.7%). Signora provided high extract content (83.8%) and wort composition was optimal (83.2%). Sladar provided high extract content (83.4%) and wort composition was favorable (82.7 %). Spilka had extract on the level of 82.4% and apparent final attenuation was 79.8%. In addition, non malting winter barley varieties were registered, two row varieties Actrice, Metaxa and six row variety Ricus.In 2009 six malting varieties of spring barley were registered in the Slovak Republic. All the studied varieties had the optimal level of proteolytic, amylolytic and cytolytic modification. The variety Donaris had extract on the level of 82.7% and wort composition on the level of 82.8 %. Eskobar had high extract content (83.0%) and apparent final attenuation achieved values of 82.6%. Extract of the variety Kangoo was on the level of 82.1% and apparent final attenuation was high (83.7%). Signora provided high extract content (83.8%) and wort composition was optimal (83.2%). Sladar provided high extract content (83.4%) and wort composition was favorable (82.7 %). Spilka had extract on the level of 82.4% and apparent final attenuation was 79.8%. In addition, non malting winter barley varieties were registered, two row varieties Actrice, Metaxa and six row variety Ricus.

Keywords: barley, variety, malting quality

Published: November 1, 2009 

References

  1. Psota, V.: Hodnocení odrůd sladovnického ječmene, sklizeň 2005 [Evaluation of Malting Barley Varieties, Harvest 2005]. Závěrečná zpráva [Final report], VÚPS, Brno 2006.
  2. Psota, V., Kosař, K.: Ukazatel sladovnické jakosti [Malting Quality Index]. Kvasny Prum. 47, 2002, 142-148. Go to original source...
  3. EBC Analysis Committee: Analytica-EBC, Verlag Hans Carl Getränke-Fachverlag, Nürnberg, 1998. ISBN 3-418-00759-7.
  4. MEBAK: Brautechnische Analysenmethoden, Band I, Freising - Weihenstephan, 1997.
  5. Basařová, G. et al.: Pivovarsko-sladařská analytika (1) [Brewing and malting analytics]. Merkanta, Praha 1992.
  6. Psota, V., Horáková, V.: Barley varieties registered in the Czech republic in 2007. Kvasny Prum. 53, 2007, 168-173. Go to original source...
  7. Psota, V., Sachambula, L., Dvořáčková, O.: Odrůdy ječmene registrované v České republice v roce 2009.Kvasny Prum.55, 2009, č. 11-12. Go to original source...

Return to the content