Kvasny Prum. 2011; 57(7-8): 296-304 | DOI: 10.18832/kp2011035

Investigation of Czech hop varieties authenticity by means of chemical and genetic analyses.Peer-reviewed article

Karel KROFTA, Josef PATZAK
Chmelařský institut s. r. o., Žatec, Kadaňská 2525, 438 46 Žatec

Autenticity of the current file of eleven Czech hop varieties was elaborated on the basis of analyses of alpha acids, beta acids, hop oils and prenylated flavonoids. Varietal discrimination was based on cohumulone ratio, contents of selected aliphatic esters and sesquiterpenes farnesene and selinenes in hop oils and content of xanthohumol, desmethylxanthohumol and xanthohumol/alpha acids ratio. Identification scheme was constructed with the help of these descriptors. Analyses of dried hops by molecular-genetic methods proved that identification of hop varieties is feasible from this material. Reliability of hop varieties identification generally depends on age of samples and on the way of raw hops processing to hop products. DNA analyses are not practicable in hop extracts and are limited in hop pellets due to DNA fractionation or destruction under processing conditions. Model tests of Saaz aroma variety adulteration with the help of chemical and geonome analyses identically showed that the lowest level of conclusiveness is at about of 10 % admixture. Recently discovered real incident of Saaz hops adulteration showed that proportion of unknown variety was in the interval of 50-70 %.Autenticity of the current file of eleven Czech hop varieties was elaborated on the basis of analyses of alpha acids, beta acids, hop oils and prenylated flavonoids. Varietal discrimination was based on cohumulone ratio, contents of selected aliphatic esters and sesquiterpenes farnesene and selinenes in hop oils and content of xanthohumol, desmethylxanthohumol and xanthohumol/alpha acids ratio. Identification scheme was constructed with the help of these descriptors. Analyses of dried hops by molecular-genetic methods proved that identification of hop varieties is feasible from this material. Reliability of hop varieties identification generally depends on age of samples and on the way of raw hops processing to hop products. DNA analyses are not practicable in hop extracts and are limited in hop pellets due to DNA fractionation or destruction under processing conditions. Model tests of Saaz aroma variety adulteration with the help of chemical and geonome analyses identically showed that the lowest level of conclusiveness is at about of 10 % admixture. Recently discovered real incident of Saaz hops adulteration showed that proportion of unknown variety was in the interval of 50-70 %.

Keywords: alpha and beta acids, hop oils, farnesene, DNA, hops adulteration

Received: June 19, 2011; Accepted: July 27, 2011; Published: July 1, 2011 

References

  1. De Keukeleire, D. et al.: Novel metodology for unambiguous identification of hop varieties. Proceedings of the 23th Convention The Institute of Brewing, Asia Pacific Section, Sydney, Australia, 1994, 129-132.
  2. De Cooman, L., Everaert, E., De Keukeleire, D.: Quantitative analysis of hop acids, essential oils and flavonoids as a clue to the identification of hop varieties.Phytochem. Analysis. 9, 1998, 145-150. Go to original source...
  3. Nickerson, G. B., Williams, P. A.: Varietal differences in the proportions of cohumulone, adhumulone and humulone in hops. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 44, 1986, 91-94. Go to original source...
  4. Wackerbauer, K., Balzer, U.: Varietal determination of German hops and hop products by HPLC analysis of humulones and lupulones. Possibilities and limitations. Monatsschr. Brauwiss. 6, 1988, 252-255.
  5. Krofta, K.: Obsah a složení chmelových pryskyřic žateckých chmelů z pohledu jejich pivovarské hodnoty. Disertační práce. VŠCHT v Praze, 2002.
  6. Roberts, M. T., Dufour, J. P., Lewis, A. C.: Application of comprehensive multidimensional gas chromatography combined with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-TOFMS) for high resolution analysis of hop essential oil. J. Sep. Sci. 27, 2004, 473-478. Go to original source...
  7. Eyres, G., Dufour, J. P.: Hop essential oils, chemical composition and odor characterics. Beer in Health and Disease Prevention. Elsevier, London, 2009.ISBN: 978-0-12-373891-2. 239-254. Go to original source...
  8. Kralj, D. et al. : Variability of essential oils of hops (Humulus lupulus L.). J. Inst. Brew. 97, 1991, 197-206. Go to original source...
  9. Likens, S. T., Nickerson, G. B.: Identification od hop varieties by gas chromagraphic analysis of thein essential oils, constancy of oil composition under various environmental ifluences. J. Agric. Food Chem. 15, 1967, 525-530. Go to original source...
  10. Peacock, V. E., Mccarty, P.: Varieta identification of hops and hop pellets. MBAA Technical Quartely. 29, 1992, 81-85.
  11. Narziss, L., Miedaner, H., Gresser, A.: Comparison of the hop oil spectrum of different varieties of hops. Brauwelt, 1986 (1), 17-22.
  12. Katsiotis, S. T. et al.: Comparative study of the essential oils from hops of various Humulus lupulus L. cultivars. Flavour Fragrance J. 4, 1984, 187-191. Go to original source...
  13. Kenny, S.T.: Identification of U.S.grown hop cultivars by hop acids and essential oil analyse. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 48, 1990, 3-8. Go to original source...
  14. Kroupa, F.: Objektivní charakteristika chmelového aroma českých chmelů a chmelových výrobků. Disertační práce.VŠCHT v Praze, 2007.
  15. Shellie, R. A. et al.: Varietal characterisation of hop (Humulus lupulus L.) by GC-MS analysis of hop cone extracts. J. Sep. Sci. 32, 2009, 3720-3725. Go to original source...
  16. Van Sumere, C. F. et al.: Biochemical identification of hop (Humulus lupulus L.) cultivars, hop pellets and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by means of RP-HPLC flavonoid fingerprints. Cerevisia, 14, 1989, 147-156.
  17. Jelínek, L.: Využití stanovení obsahu jednotlivých polyfenolů pro určení odrůdy chmele. Diplomová práce. VŠCHT v Praze, 2009.
  18. Patzak, J.: Characterization of Czech hop (Humulus lupulus L.) genotypes by molecular methods. Rostl. výroba. 48, 2002, 343-350. Go to original source...
  19. Murakami, A.:The practical application of PCR for the verification of hop variety. MBAATechnical Quarterly. 35, 1998, 185-188.
  20. Patzak, J.: Assessment of somaclonal variability in hop in vitro meristem cultures and clones by molecular methods. Euphytica, 131, 2003, 343-350. Go to original source...
  21. Hadonou, A. M., Walden, R., Darby, P.: Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites for assessment of genetic variation of hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 2004, 280. Go to original source...
  22. Jakse, J., Bandelj, D., Javornik, B.: Eleven new microsatellites for hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2, 2002, 544. Go to original source...
  23. Stajner, N., Jakse, J., Kozjak, P., Javornik, B.: The isolation and characterisation of microsatellites in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Plant Sci. 168, 2005, 213-221. Go to original source...
  24. Patzak, J.: Využití moderních molekulárních metod u chmele. Chmelařská ročenka 2011. VUPS, Praha, 2011, 126.
  25. Nesvadba V., Brynda M., Patzak J., Krofta K.: Metodika pro udržení odrůdové čistoty chmelových porostů. Metodika pro praxi 5/08 Žatec, Chmelařský institut, 2008, ISBN 978-80-86836-87-4.
  26. Krofta, K.: Hodnocení kvality chmele. Metodika pro praxi 4/08. Chmelařský institut Žatec, 2008, ISBN 978-80-86836-84-3.
  27. Krofta, K., Čepička, J.: Stanovení chmelových silic metodou SPME. Kvasný průmysl. 46, 2000, 235-241. Go to original source...
  28. Patzak, J.: Comparison of RAPD, STS, ISSR and AFLP molecular methods used for assessment of genetic diversity in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Euphytica 121, 2001, 9-18. Go to original source...
  29. Patzak, J.,Vrba, L., Matousek, J.(2007):New STS molecular markers for assessment of genetic diversity and DNA fingerprinting in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Genome 50, 2007, 15-25. Go to original source...
  30. Patzak J., Matoušek, J.:Development and evaluation of expressed sequence tag-derived microsatellite (EST-SSR) markers for genotyping of hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Biologia Plantarum 55, 2011, in press. Go to original source...
  31. Araki, S., Tsuchiya, Y., Masachika, T., Tamaki, T., Shinotsuka, K.: Identification of hop cultivars by DNA marker analysis. J. Amer. Soc. Brew. Chem. 56, 1998, 93-98. Go to original source...
  32. Townsend, M. S., Henning, J. A., Moore, D. L.: AFLP analysis of DNA dried hop cones. Crop Sci. 40, 2000, 1383-1386. Go to original source...
  33. Fleischer, R., Horlemann, C., Schwekendiek, A., Kling, C.,Weber, G.: AFLP fingerprinting in hop: analysis of the genetic variability of the Tetnang variety. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 51, 2004, 211-220. Go to original source...