Kvasny Prum. 2013; 59(2): 33-40 | DOI: 10.18832/kp2013004

Spontaneous liberation of carbon dioxide from beer and gushing.Peer-reviewed article

Jan ŠAVEL, Petr KOŠIN, Adam BROŽ
Budějovický Budvar, n.p., Karolíny Světlé 4, 370 21 České Budějovice

Release of carbon dioxide from beer bottle after its opening was measured as the rate of gas liberation or the liquid volume displacement from the bottle . Results confirm the importance of solid particles and gases that are bonded on their surfaces during spontaneous liberation of carbon dioxide from beer and carbonated water, which does not contain any hydrofobins . Such a mechanism can be applied to inorganic and organic substances including cellulose and activated charcoal, which can be considered as thermally degraded cellulose . Small cellulose particles may be part of the beer, and their formation may also be enhanced by mold infection of grains . The degradation of malt grain walls can be accelerated by penetration of fungi that might produce nano and microparticles of cellulose . Rate of carbon dioxide liberation also depends on other factors, such as its concentration, the presence of other gases (e .g . air), the temperature, mechanical movement, beer composition and the supply of gases bounded to the surface of insoluble particles in beer . Its role also has the concentration of microbubbles and the speed of their movement, at which microbubbles can be enriched by diffusion of CO2, of which concentration in the liquid declines . Measurement of CO2 liberation rate can be helpful during studies of factors inducing or suppressing gushing .Release of carbon dioxide from beer bottle after its opening was measured as the rate of gas liberation or the liquid volume displacement from the bottle . Results confirm the importance of solid particles and gases that are bonded on their surfaces during spontaneous liberation of carbon dioxide from beer and carbonated water, which does not contain any hydrofobins . Such a mechanism can be applied to inorganic and organic substances including cellulose and activated charcoal, which can be considered as thermally degraded cellulose . Small cellulose particles may be part of the beer, and their formation may also be enhanced by mold infection of grains . The degradation of malt grain walls can be accelerated by penetration of fungi that might produce nano and microparticles of cellulose . Rate of carbon dioxide liberation also depends on other factors, such as its concentration, the presence of other gases (e .g . air), the temperature, mechanical movement, beer composition and the supply of gases bounded to the surface of insoluble particles in beer . Its role also has the concentration of microbubbles and the speed of their movement, at which microbubbles can be enriched by diffusion of CO2, of which concentration in the liquid declines . Measurement of CO2 liberation rate can be helpful during studies of factors inducing or suppressing gushing .

Keywords: gushing, beer, decarbonization, CO2 flow rate, cellulose, activated charcoal, saturated beverage, microbubbles

Received: September 21, 2012; Published: February 1, 2013 

References

  1. Amaha, M., Kitabatake, K., 1981: Gushing in beer. In: Brewing Science. Ed. J.R.A. Pollock, Academic Press London: 457-489. ISBN 978-0125610025.
  2. Běláková, S., Benešová, K., Mikulíková, R., Svoboda, Z., 2012: Faktory ovlivňující gushing. Kvasny Prum. 58(3): 62-65. Go to original source...
  3. Brož, A., Košin, P., Šavel, J., 2012: Practical tools for brewer's fight against gushing. EBC BSG meeting 6th - 7th september, Carlsberg research center, Copenhagen 2012.
  4. Campenhout, Van L., Iserentant, D., Verachtert. H., 1998: On-line measurement of the microbial impacts on the germination of barley during malting. J. Inst. Brew. 104(3): 197-202 Go to original source...
  5. Casey, G.P., 1996: Primary versus secondary gushing and assay procedures used to assess malt/beer gushing potential. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 33(4): 229-235.
  6. Deckers, S.M., Gebruers, K., Baggerman, G., Lorgouilloux, Y., Delcour, J.A., Michiels, C., Derdelinckx, G., Martens, J., Neven, H., 2010: CO2-hydrophobin structures acting as nanobombs in beer. Part 1: A critical review of hypotheses and mechanisms. Brewing Science 63(3/4): 54-61.
  7. Devereux, M.G., Lee, W.T., 2011: Mathematical modelling of bubble nucleattion in stout beers and experimental verification. Proc. World Congr. Engin. WCE 2011, Vol. I. ISBN 978-988-18210-6-5.
  8. Gardner, R.J., 1973: The mechanismus of gushing - A review. J. Inst. Brew. 79: 275-286. Go to original source...
  9. Gastl, M., Zarnkow, M., Back, W., 2009: Gushing - a multicausal problem. Brauwelt Int. 27(1): 16-20.
  10. Hanke, S., Kern, M., Hermann, M., Back, W., Becker, T., Krottenthaler, M., 2009: Suppression of gushing by hop constituents. Brewing Science 62(11/12): 181-186.
  11. Christian, M., Ilberg, V., Titze, J., Friess, A., Jacob, F., Parlar, H., 2009: Gushing laboratory tests as successful methods for obtaining new cognitions on gushing. Brewing Science 62(5/6): 83-89.
  12. Christian, M., Titze, J., Ilberg, V., Jacob, F., 2011: Novel perspectives in gushing analysis: A review. J. Inst. Brew. 117(3): 295-313. Go to original source...
  13. Jones, S.F., Evans, G.M., Galvin, K.P., 1999: Bubble nucleation from gas cavities - a review. Advances Coll. Interface Sci. 80: 27-50. Go to original source...
  14. Kunert, M., Sacher, B., Back, W., 2001: Ergenbnisse einer Umfrage in deutschen Brauereien zum Thema "Gushing". Brauwelt 141(9- 10): 350-362.
  15. Mitani, Y., Joh, M., Segawa, S., Shinotsuka, K., Ohgaki, K., 2002: Dynamic behavior of carbon dioxide gas related to formation and diminution of beer foam. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 60(1): 1-9. Go to original source...
  16. Pellaud, J., 2002: Gushing: state of the art. Cerevisia 27: 189-205.
  17. Rath, F., 2009: Gushing in 2008 - trialing the "Modified Carlsberg test". Brauwelt Int. 27(1): 26-29.
  18. Roubík, K., 2006: Modelování biologických systémů metodou elektrických analogií a její aplikace na respirační soustavu. Lékař a technika 36(1):18-23.
  19. Shokribousjein, Z., Deckers, S.M., Gebruers, K., Lorgouillox, A., Baggermann, G., Verachtert, H., Delcour, J.A., Etienne, P., Rock, J., Michiels, G., Derdelinckx, G., 2011: Hydrophobins, beer foaming and gushing. Cerevisia 35: 85-101. Go to original source...
  20. Šavel, J., 2004: Měření vzdušného kyslíku a nadměrného pěnění piva v obalech. Kvasny Prum. 50(3): 66-69. Go to original source...
  21. Winkelmann, L., Hinzmann, E., 2009: The gushing puzzle - parts are still missing. Brauwelt Int. 27(1): 13-15.
  22. Zepf, M., Geiger, E., 2000: Gushing problems caused by calcium oxalate, Part 1, Brauwelt Int. 18(6): 473-475.
  23. Zepf, M., Geiger, E., 2001: Gushing problems caused by calcium oxalate (2), Brauwelt Int. 19(5): 420-425.