Kvasny Prum. 2009; 55(6): 150-157 | DOI: 10.18832/kp2009015

Barley varieties registered in the Czech Republic in 2009.Peer-reviewed article

Vratislav PSOTA, Lenka SACHAMBULA, Olga DVOŘÁČKOVÁ
1 Výzkumný ústav pivovarský a sladařský, a.s., Sladařský ústav, Mostecká 7, CZ-614 00 Brno
2 ÚKZÚZ, Národní odrůdový úřad, Hroznová 2, CZ-656 06 Brno

In 2009 following malting varieties of spring barley were registered in the Czech Republic: Advent, Henley, Henrike, Signora, Streif, and Vista. The winter barley malting variety Wintmalt was also registered. Content of nitrogenous substances moved from 10.4-11.3%. Extract content lower than 82.0% was determined only in the varieties Vista (81.6%) and Wintmalt (81.8%). Only the variety Henrike had high level of proteolytic modification. Proteolytic modification in the other varieties was very good to optimal. Amylolytic and cytolytic modification in all varieties was on the optimal level. Higher β-glucan content was only in the varieties Advent (301 mg/l) and Streif (253 mg/l). The variety Advent was recommended by the RIBM for the production of Czech Beer. The variety Wintmalt enlarged the possibility to acquire a quality malting material for winter barley. In addition, nonmalting spring barley variety Kontiki and nonmalting variety of hulless spring barley AF Lucius were registered. In 2009 four nonmalting varieties of winter barley, two-rowed variety Faraon and three six-rowed varieties Heike, Saffron, and Wendy were registered.In 2009 following malting varieties of spring barley were registered in the Czech Republic: Advent, Henley, Henrike, Signora, Streif, and Vista. The winter barley malting variety Wintmalt was also registered. Content of nitrogenous substances moved from 10.4-11.3%. Extract content lower than 82.0% was determined only in the varieties Vista (81.6%) and Wintmalt (81.8%). Only the variety Henrike had high level of proteolytic modification. Proteolytic modification in the other varieties was very good to optimal. Amylolytic and cytolytic modification in all varieties was on the optimal level. Higher β-glucan content was only in the varieties Advent (301 mg/l) and Streif (253 mg/l). The variety Advent was recommended by the RIBM for the production of Czech Beer. The variety Wintmalt enlarged the possibility to acquire a quality malting material for winter barley. In addition, nonmalting spring barley variety Kontiki and nonmalting variety of hulless spring barley AF Lucius were registered. In 2009 four nonmalting varieties of winter barley, two-rowed variety Faraon and three six-rowed varieties Heike, Saffron, and Wendy were registered.

Keywords: spring barley, malting quality, variety

Published: June 1, 2009 

References

  1. EBC Analysis committee: Analytica-EBC. Carl, Getränke-Fachverlag, Nürnberg, 1998.
  2. MEBAK: Brautechnische Analysenmethoden, MEBAK, Weihenstephan - Freising, 1997.
  3. Baxter, E. D., O'Farrell, D. D.: Use of the friabilimeter to assess homogeneity of malt. J. Inst. Brew. 89, 1983, 210-214. Go to original source...
  4. Briggs, D. E.: Malts and Malting. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, pp.622-624, 1997.
  5. Psota,V., Kosař, K.:Malting Quality Index.Kvasny Prum.47, 2002, 142-148. Go to original source...
  6. Kolektiv: Metodiky státních odrůdových zkoušek ÚKZÚZ, podle platného znění z roku 1999 [Methods of plant variety state tests CISTA, pursuant to the valid wording from the year 1999]. ÚKZÚZ, Kroměříž, 1999.
  7. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1014/2008 of 16 October 2008 entering certain names in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (České pivo (PGI), Cebreiro (PDO)) Official Journal of the European Union L 276, 27, 17. 10. 2008.
  8. Other Acts Commission Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union C 16, 14, 23. 1. 2008.
  9. Psota, V.: Evaluation of malting barley varieties, harvest 2008. Final Report, RIBM, Praha, 2008.
  10. http://www.kws-lochow.de/saat/ctrl.jsp?cat=18&item=5:2363
  11. http://www.bundessortenamt.de/internet30/fileadmin/Files/PDF/bsl_getreide_2008.pdf